The Lure of Pleasure and The Anchor of Guilt
by James Scott
We are all familiar with the eternal battle of opposites: black and white, night and day, yin and yang and then we have pleasure and pain where the intensified satisfaction of pleasure is heightened by the feeling of wrong doing as one is getting away with something for that momentary blip on the screen where the stars align. The media took off with this concept to personify the action that leads to this heightened state as a ‘guilty pleasure’.
In the corporate environment, retail, advertising etc. the justification for the pleasure with a subliminal block from the sub emotion of guilt stemming from the absolute emotion of fear must be introduced via a ‘you deserve it’ trigger. “Chocolate is bad for you but you’ve worked all day and instead of shooting heroin you have an innocent chocolate bar while you watch American Idol instead of working on those reports for the office”.
Two things: first the severity of the action was off balanced by a similar vice but with far worse complications and side effects and second guilt was not taken away just places on the lack of follow through with the reports so we blame American Idol. Now, the action of eating chocolate while on a diet is justified and innocent compared to the distractions of the idea of heroin addiction and the guilt displacement of associating that to the ‘fear’ of not getting the reports done.
Obviously ‘heroin’ was a bit over the top but in an attempt to memetically anchor this concept into the reader’s day to day definition of guilt and pleasure an extreme example typically works. I’ll bet the next time you want to go out for a drink with friends you’ll tell your spouse, “I’m going out with friends to have an innocent drink and conversation. It’s not as if I’m going to a crack house to shoot heroin with thrice used syringes from a hepatitis infected pimp, HIV infected hooker and homeless man with slimy growths populating the space of his body”. They’ll be so shocked at this reality check that they’ll be thankful that all you’re doing is going down to the corner pub for a quick drink with friends.
One could use this process to persuade and/or justify telling an executive he/she needs to come on Saturday instead of going to little Johnny’s baseball game. First: what is more severe and where can the category emotion be placed? Maybe: “Its horrible that Ned was just let go. Did you hear about that? (let it settle in for a few seconds so that the target can visualize and feel how Ned must feel and just hope he’s not next. You’ll know the visualization and feeling is complete because the first mechanism of fear is ‘banter’ so just as you see him/her inhale for a breath before responding interrupt with…) Oh! By the way I’m going to need you to come in for a few hours on Saturday. I know it’s short notice but hey, it could be worse, you could be Ned and without a job. Besides, it’s because of his department that you need to come in and clean up this mess.” There, coming in on Saturday seems light in comparison to losing your job and you won’t take the blame because the emotion attached to the idea of coming in and missing Johnny’s game was displaced on a department where they are making cuts.
This concept has parallels in marketing, corporate environment and even the home front. Master this art and you’ll never need to argue or debate your point again.
